In a recent thread on Python edu-sig, Kirby Urner started a discussion about the use of python's decorators in mathematics. Some of the examples included numerically computing derivatives (and integrals) of functions. This generated a fair bit of discussion and the general conclusion was that this was not a good use of decorators. Some information contributed by yours truly required the reader to do a graph to properly visualise exactly what was going on. I thought it appropriate to present a summary that included the required graphical information here as a permanent record.

The mathematical definition of the derivative of a function f(x) at point x is to take a limit as "h" goes to zero of the following expression:

( f(x+h) - f(x) ) / h

An example is given below: the red curve is the function f(x) and the green curve is the tangent line at x (with same slope as the derivative). The blue curve is a line going through x whose slope equals that of the above formula with a non-zero value of h.

As you can see, the slopes of the two straight lines are quite different. A better way of numerically computing the derivative for the same value of "h" is by taking a symmetrical interval around x as follows:

( f(x + h/2) - f(x - h/2) ) / h

This is illustrated in the next picture. As you can see, the two straight lines have much more similar slopes - hence, the value computed for the derivative is going to be more accurate.

The corresponding python code is as follows:

def derivative(f):

...."""

....Computes the numerical derivative of a function.

...."""

....def df(x, h=0.1e-5):

........return ( f(x+h/2) - f(x-h/2) )/h

....return df

And we use it as follows:

# sample function

def g(x): return x*x*x

# first derivative

dg = derivative(g)

# second derivative

d2g = derivative(dg) # == derivative(derivative(g))

# printing the value computed at a given point:

print dg(3)

print dg(3, 0.001)

print dg(3, 1e-10) # smaller h is not always more precise

## Friday, April 08, 2005

Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)